GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Those were two of the very first men to buy a suppressor without an ATF Form 4, which requires your fingerprints be submitted to the federal government along with a $200 tax in order to purchase a device that makes your constitutionally protected boomsticks quieter.
Extensive regulation meant to curb the Second Amendment (AKA disarm Americans so only the government has guns) has made suppressors extremely expensive, with ridiculous wait times and massive criminal penalties for not following the proper bureaucratic red tape.
But times, they are a-changin'!
This month, a federal judge issued a ruling that overturned major portions of the 1934 National Firearms Act.
Legally speaking, the legality of purchasing suppressors without the ATF's permission is still in a grey area. Only customers or members of the plaintiffs in the case (including Silencer Shop, Silencer Central, Palmetto State Armory, B&T USA, and Gun Owners of America) are allowed to skip the tax-stamp process.
In addition, states have a variety of laws that clash with the federal ruling. Illinois, for example, bans suppressors outright.
The best way to navigate the confusion is to talk to local dealers. Flashpoint Firearms in Grand Rapids, Michigan, notes that customers still need to submit the ATF form because MCL 750.224 actually bans the sale of suppressors in the state. Michiganders can still buy suppressors, however, because the law includes a provision for items that are legal at the federal level.
This ruling may actually hurt the residents of those states, because if there is no federal process to be approved for a suppressor ... then the state bans may kick in with full force.
Besides Michigan, other states where suppressors may actually become banned include Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin.
That said, there are 27 free states where residents of said states can walk into a store today and buy a suppressor with a normal background check. A number of new lawsuits can be expected to challenge state laws, with many 2A entities pushing to take the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court.
While the pro-freedom Trump admin has signaled that it does not intend to challenge the district court ruling, there are reportedly elements within the vast federal bureaucracy that are scheming to take away our fun as we speak.
If you want to learn more because you live in a squishy, liberalish state that thinks firearms are scary and only the people who tax us should have them, here's a great video that discusses the situation on the ground and what challenges in court may come next:
Enjoy that freedom responsibly, my friends! โ
Watch our latest video ๐
