Rep. Rashida Tlaib recently condemned U.S. military action in Iran with a blunt declaration:
Subscribe to view the full article, including all images, videos, and social media embeds.
It's a morally loaded sentence that drew immediate counterpunches from several quarters:
Subscribe to view the full article, including all images, videos, and social media embeds.
Subscribe to view the full article, including all images, videos, and social media embeds.
On its face, what Tlaib said carries some weight. War is destructive, regime change is costly, and civilian suffering is real.
But forgive me for focusing a moment on the messenger here. Memory matters.
And in October 2023 - that would be the immediate aftermath of the hideous Hamas massacre of Israeli civilians - Tlaib posted a video that included the line:
Resistance is justified when people are occupied.
That remark drew bipartisan criticism and ultimately led to her censure in the House of Representatives (22 of her fellow Democrats joined the Republicans in doing so). Tlaib protested at the time that she'd been "taken out of context," and her defenders insisted the phrase was not an endorsement of violence, but a general statement about oppressed peoples.
When a statement about "justified resistance" is issued in close proximity to one of the bloodiest terrorist attacks in modern history - one that included the slaughter of civilians - it doesn't read like a philosophy lecture.
It reads like commentary on real bloodshed.
Fast-forward to her recent statement, and the tension writes itself. One must wonder why Tlaib celebrated the "resistance" of the Palestinian people, but not the resistance (and joy) of the Iranians this week:
Subscribe to view the full article, including all images, videos, and social media embeds.
If killing and destruction cannot liberate, as Tlaib says, that principle must apply universally rather than selectively. If violence in the name of "freeing" people is morally incoherent, then that critique extends to all actors, not only to Western governments.
The issue here is not whether one supports U.S. action in Iran. Reasonable people can debate that. The issue is Tlaib's credibility.
Or more precisely, her lack of credibility.
Enjoying this article? Subscribe for full access.
Subscribers see every embed, image, and video inline — plus comments and our fully-featured social platform.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Not the Bee or any of its affiliates.
