Pete Buttigieg can’t believe it's still considered radical to pack the Supreme Court, abolish Electoral College

Were you wondering when we'd all hear from ol' Pete again? Well, wonder no more.

Yeah, you're right, Pete. Why would anyone think that someone wanting to do away with the very foundational structures upon which the country was built, essentially dismantling the nation itself, is, in any way, "radical"?

After all, why should the integrity of the highest court in the land be preserved?

Pete on the Supreme Court:

'I would have term limits, more justices, and some process that makes it less partisan of who the justices are. Some different ways to do that, the one I think is most interesting is called the balance bench proposal. We have a mix. The point is it needs to change.'

For anyone not fluent in liberal-speak, "make it less partisan" means, "A lot of the current justices do things I don't like, so I want more justices who do things the way I want them to."

And don't get me started on the abolition of the Electoral College.

Buttigieg once again proves that, given the opportunity, even the "sensible" Democrats would just toss out the way the United States functions and replace it with … something else.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis sees through the notion that this philosophy is, in any way, "moderate":

Why stop at the Supreme Court and the Senate, even?

Just go ahead and light the Constitution on fire while you're at it!