"Landmark" new study claims significant link between vaccines and autism. Details here.

Profile photo of Harambe
Harambe Harambe
Image for article: "Landmark" new study claims significant link between vaccines and autism. Details here.

Y'all know that the autism-vaccine debate is one of the most live-wire, hot-button issues right now. People come to blows over it, figuratively and probably sometimes literally. It's a fraught question.

Here's one more entry in the ongoing back-and-forth:

BREAKING: LANDMARK PEER-REVIEWED STUDY FINDS VACCINATION IS A MAJOR RISK FACTOR FOR AUTISM

We found 79% of studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 of 136) reported evidence consistent with a vaccine - autism link.

The study was published in the Journal of Independent Medicine, a publication that says it is devoted to "advancing unbiased, multi-specialty medical research, with a focus on alternative therapies, repurposed drugs, medical ethics, and healthcare policies."

The journal claims it "operate[s] without funding from pharmaceutical companies or governmental agencies, ensuring independence and objectivity." Its editor is Joseph Varon, a professor at the University of Houston College of Medicine.

So what did this most recent study set out to do? It sums it up in the abstract:

We comprehensively examined epidemiologic, clinical, and mechanistic studies evaluating potential [autism spectrum disorder, ASD] risk factors, assessing outcomes, exposure quantification, strength and independence of associations, temporal relationships, internal and external validity, overall cohesiveness, and biological plausibility.

In layman's terms, this is essentially what's known as a "meta-study," one that examines other studies and organizes the information in an intelligible way. Whereas before the medical data might have been spread out across dozens of different reviews and experiments, a meta-study gathers it all together under one roof, so to speak.

Here's what the researchers found:

Key determinants of new-onset ASD before age nine include advanced parental age, premature delivery, genetic variants, sibling recurrence, maternal immune activation, in utero drug exposure, environmental toxicants, gut - brain axis disruption, and cumulative routine childhood vaccination.

Many of these findings are completely uncontroversial. "Genetic variants," drug exposure in utero, "advanced parental age," these have been widely acceptable as possible determinants of autism for years. It's the "cumulative routine childhood vaccination" that will stir up anger here.

Reviewing the data, the researchers allege that studies showing "no link" between routine vaccinations and autism "remains highly fragmented and methodologically constrained." Most such studies, it claims "have focused on a narrow subset of the vaccine schedule ...rather than the full, cumulative series administered under the CDC childhood program."

Yet many other "positive association" studies show a more complex and potentially determinative relationship, according to the authors:

Beyond potential determinants such as common genetic polymorphisms, advanced parental age, premature delivery, sibling recurrence, gut - brain axis alterations, in utero drug exposures, and environmental toxicants, the evidence indicates that combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination represents a major modifiable risk factor for ASD. The overall weight of the data supports this conclusion, with convergent evidence from population-level correlations, epidemiologic studies, and biologic plausibility across immune, mitochondrial, and neuroinflammatory pathways.

Translation: The evidence indicates, but does not prove, a link between vaccine and autism.

Is this accurate? The study's authors certainly seem to think so. Millions of parents apparently do as well. Millions more parents, of course โ€” and seemingly most other doctors โ€” disagree strongly.

This won't end the debate. Not even close! Many people have already made up their minds on this one way or the other and will probably never change it. Many more are still on the fence. There will be more studies, more tests, more data.

The study authors, meanwhile, conclude bluntly:

These conclusions highlight the urgent need for independent, longitudinal studies assessing the safety of the full cumulative pediatric vaccine schedule and should guide future research and policy decisions aimed at mitigating the growing autism burden.

What do you think? Talk about it below. ๐Ÿ‘‡


Watch our latest video ๐Ÿ‘‡

Keep up with our latest videos โ€” Subscribe to our YouTube channel!