TikTok women are using star signs to defend the mom who killed her three kids

Profile photo of Joel Abbott
Joel Abbott
Image for article: TikTok women are using star signs to defend the mom who killed her three kids

The story of Lindsay Clancy is tragic, but it has taken an even more tragic twist.

The wife and mom of three kids was on a cocktail of psychiatric drugs, including multiple rotating SSRIs and benzodiazepines. She had initially sought help for postpartum depression after the birth of her youngest child, who was 8 months old at the time he was murdered on January 24, 2023.

Our barbaric medical establishment put Clancy on sertraline, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, trazodone, lorazepam, clonazepam, buspirone, quetiapine, and more in just a FEW SHORT MONTHS, hoping to "fix" her.

If you have been prescribed any of these drugs, you intimately understand that they can be literal hell on earth. There is an entire community dedicated to surviving and tapering off these "medicines." Because they modulate your central nervous system, it can take years for the insomnia, sweats, searing pain, mood swings, and autonomic dysfunction to stop (ask me how I know).

Clancy confessed that she sent her husband to run an errand, killed her three kids, then slit her wrists and jumped out of a second-story window to end her own life.

There are still questions that have to be answered.

But instead of watching the trial somberly and respectfully, and then following the evidence as presented, the women of TikTok have decided to make a great case for repealing the 19th Amendment by arguing that Clancy is innocent and her husband is guilty because of the pair's astrological signs.

Yeah...

The low-IQ female conspiracy fans are everywhere (I think I just found Candace Owens' core audience?):

To poke fun at the lowest-IQ women of TikTok, men began commenting like this about recent horror stories where men have been the family-murderers:

The same women who are defending a mom who strangled her little kids are likely the same ones who say Erika Kirk is guilty of murdering her husband.

But if you point out their moral and logical inconsistencies, or suggest that they are acting like superstitious shamans from some backwards ancient tribe, they will attack you.

Conservative commentator Matt Walsh, who rather enjoys poking the bear, immediately drew their ire.

When they called him a hypocrite and a sexist for saying Clancy should be punished despite the maddening effects of her psych drugs (she has pled "not guilty" based on the claim that the drugs made her do it), Walsh responded with this zinger:

Remember, each of those women on TikTok (who have racked up hundreds of millions of views) has an equal vote to yours!


Watch our latest video 👇

Keep up with our latest videos — Subscribe to our YouTube channel!